Wastewater treatment system

ABSTRACT

The present invention is a system and method for treating a wastewater stream to produce an effluent having an acceptable level of turbidity. The invention comprises a controller operatively coupled to at least one turbidity meter for monitoring turbidity of the effluent stream. A plurality of chemical treatment additive pumps are provided for providing a plurality of additives to the wastewater stream. Furthermore, a method of sequentially testing the amount of each additive required to produce an effluent stream having an acceptable turbidity is disclosed.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates generally to a system and method oftreating wastewater to produce a chemically acceptable effluent streamand more particularly to an automated system and method for treatingwastewater that controls contaminant levels of a plurality ofcontaminants present in the wastewater while simultaneously minimizingchemical treatment costs and monetary fines imposed due to the releaseof substandard effluent into a municipal sewage system.

2. Description of the Related Art

The treatment of industrial wastewater is a necessary and difficult taskcommon to most, if not all manufacturing facilities. A vast array ofcontaminants that are byproducts of manufacturing processes may beremoved from the process by a wastewater stream. Accordingly, thiswastewater stream carries contaminants in the form of suspended solidsthat range widely in size, as well as an assortment of liquids-oils,surfactants, polymers, acids, fats, blood, process ingredients, metalsalts, total suspended solids (TSS), biological oxygen demand (BOD),chemical oxygen demand (COD) and the like. It is therefore necessary—infact required—to remove and/or neutralize these contaminants to maintainan effluent stream that meets the minimum standards of wastewater sewagefor a given locale prior to releasing the effluent into a sewage system.

As an added incentive, many municipalities levy fines for the dischargeof effluents that do not meet their minimum standards, therebypotentially greatly increasing the cost of doing business. This problemis particularly acute where an effluent stream is highly variable, sinceit is difficult to maintain effluent stream contamination standards whenthe incoming wastewater stream varies greatly in its contaminant levels.

A variety of prior art systems for wastewater treatment employingvarious technical approaches have attempted to solve these problems.Systems employing tanks and weirs for separation of contaminants fromliquids through sedimentation have been in widespread use. Sedimentationin holding tanks is often accompanied by utilizing filtration systemssuch as filters or screens to remove small solid particles in theeffluent stream. However, filtration systems require a great deal ofmaintenance and are subject to clogging or partial clogging, therebyimpeding flow through a system.

Dissolved air flotation systems (DAF's) have been employed with somedegree of success wherein air bubbles are introduced at a lower portionof a dissolved in flotation tank to carry particles suspended in theliquid to the surface thereof. The solids at the surface aggregatetogether, either naturally or through the use of coagulant additives,thereby permitting removal of at least a portion of the solids in thewastewater. Effluent is then drawn from a lower portion of the DAFsystem. Furthermore, a variety of flotation systems are used where thesolids being removed have densities close to that of water.

DAF systems vary widely in the time required to process a givenwastewater stream depending upon the flow rate, contaminant levels,residence time of air bubbles in the DAF tank, the turbulence of theliquid stream being introduced to the DAF tank, DAF tank size, and thepresence of more than one wastewater stream entering a tank. Due to theunpredictable nature of these variables there may be a considerable timelag between introduction of treatment chemicals into the wastewaterstream and acceptable effluent contamination levels at the outlet of theDAF. This difficulty is further enhanced by widely varying contaminantlevels in wastewater streams.

Many wastewater solids may include charged particles—oils, greases,fats, and other emulsified particles. Treatment of these types ofcontaminants often includes the use of coagulant and flocculant chemicaladditives to produce colloidal particles, termed “flocs” which can thenbe skimmed and removed. However, the use of coagulants and flocculantsfor neutralizing these contaminants must be carefully monitored becausein too great a quantity, the flocs tend to break apart as they onceagain acquire a charge. In this situation, the wastewater treatmentchemicals have been utterly wasted, and the wastewater must bere-treated before release into an effluent stream or be discharged asnon-compliant wastewater.

Additionally, in many wastewater systems the pH of the wastewater streammust be modified to an acceptable level by the addition of cationic oranionic chemicals into the wastewater stream, and frequent testing of pHlevels of the effluent to maintain proper pH balance.

In order to properly balance the chemical additives required to treat acontaminated wastewater stream, plant operators typically conduct “jar”tests wherein a plurality of jars or containers are filled from thewastewater stream, and each is treated with a differing chemicaladditive, or alternatively a combination of chemical additives, indiffering amounts. When multiple additives such as coagulants andpolymers are required to treat the wastewater, a plurality of jar testsare required to test various combinations of additive amounts todetermine which combination results in an effluent that is acceptablefor discharge from the system.

The requisite amount of chemical additives necessary to treat thewastewater are then recorded, and the flow rate of each additive mustthen be calculated based upon the rate of flow of wastewater into thetreatment system. Once the proper flow rates are established thechemical additives are typically supplied to the system by pumps, whichmust be set to deliver the proper additive flows.

One great difficulty of this system of wastewater treatment is that ifthe wastewater input stream changes appreciably, the additives must bereadjusted, thereby requiring additional jar tests. Additionally, achange in wastewater stream flow requires the pumps to be adjusted,since the proportion of additives must be adjusted proportionally to thewastewater stream flow. Furthermore, in many manufacturing environmentsit is impractical to train personnel to monitor the effluent stream,conduct periodic and frequent jar tests, calculate additive flow rates,make pump adjustments, and carefully monitor incoming stream flow ratesin order to maintain the treatment system's operation.

Accordingly, there is a need for an automated wastewater treatmentsystem that is capable of monitoring an effluent stream for out of rangecontaminant levels, conducting jar tests, and adjusting additive flowrates accordingly.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention obviates the aforementioned problems inherent inthe prior art by providing a system and method of wastewater treatmentthat produces an effluent stream within an acceptable turbidity rangewithout the need for costly and time-consuming manual “jar” teststypically practiced in the art.

Specifically, the invention utilizes a controller, for example anindustrial controller having a microprocessor, data memory, and aplurality of inputs and outputs that interface with various systemcomponents as set forth in greater detail below. The controller isoperatively coupled to a turbidity meter, or a plurality thereof, thatprovides a signal representative of turbidity at a point or points inthe effluent stream for determining whether the effluent stream iswithin an acceptable turbidity.

A plurality of pumps is provided for supplying a plurality of chemicaladditives to the wastewater stream to control the turbidity thereof.Each pump is operatively coupled to the controller whereby thecontroller supplies a plurality of flow rate set point signals toinitiate and conduct a jar test to determine the proper balance ofadditives supplied to the wastewater stream to produce the bestturbidity reading.

Other features, objects and advantages of the present invention willbecome apparent from the detailed description of the preferredembodiments appended herein below and taken in conjunction with theattached drawing Figures.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIGURES

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a wastewater control system in accordancewith one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a wastewater control system in accordancewith one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a plurality of user adjustable system parameters that may bestored in data memory in accordance with one embodiment of the presentinvention.

FIGS. 4A-4C are exemplary flow charts of system operation in accordancewith one embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S)

Referring now to the drawing Figures, and in accordance with a oneembodiment of the present invention a system 10 and method of treating awastewater stream 1 to produce an effluent stream 2 having a contaminantconcentration below a predetermined threshold comprises a wastewatertreatment facility 20 having a storage or dissolved air filtration tank(DAF) 30, a wastewater inlet 40 for providing contaminated wastewater totank 30, and an effluent outlet 50 for withdrawing treated wastewater 1from tank 30. Furthermore, a plurality of floc (or flocculant) tubes 60may be provided between inlet 40 and tank 30 to mix wastewater 1 withtreatment chemicals prior to its introduction into tank 30.

Tank 30 may comprise a dissolved air flotation device (hereinafter DAF)for introducing air bubbles into wastewater 1 thereby aiding inseparation and flotation of coagulated solids to the surface of tank 30.It should be noted that throughout this specification for purposes ofclear explication the present invention will be described in the contextof operation within a DAF wastewater treatment facility. However, thepresent invention may be practiced in conjunction with a broad spectrumof wastewater filtration systems such as sedimentation systems,clarifiers, separators, equalization tanks and the like, withoutdeparting from the scope of the invention.

System 10 further comprises a controller 100 having a microprocessor102, or a plurality thereof, and concomitant data memory 104 for storingprocess variables. Controller 100 further comprises a plurality ofinputs 110 for accepting electrical signals from system 10 componentsand a plurality of outputs 112 for supplying signals to system 10components. Additionally, an operator interface 120 may be operativelycoupled to controller 100 to enable a user to monitor and control systemoperation as discussed further herein below. Controller 100 may compriseone of many commercially available controllers including but not limitedto programmable logic controllers (PLC's) having configurable input andoutput cards, distributed logic controllers, personal computers orproprietary microprocessors having the requisite inputs and outputs tocontrol system 10. Furthermore, operator interface 120 may comprise oneof many commercially available operator interfaces utilizing videodisplays, touch screens, keyboards and the like to permit user controlof system 10.

System 10 further includes a flow meter 140 disposed in the wastewaterinlet 40 line, capable of measuring the flow rate of wastewater throughinlet 40. Flow meter 140 may comprise a flow output signal 142representative of wastewater flow operatively coupled to an input 110 ofcontroller 100 whereby controller 100 is capable of monitoring the flowrate of wastewater entering system 10. As shown in FIG. 2 a pH meter 150may be provided proximate inlet 40 having an output 152 representativeof the pH of the wastewater stream prior to treatment, which output 152is operatively coupled to an input 110 of controller 100. Additionally,a pH meter 150 may be disposed proximate effluent outlet 50 such thatcontroller 100 may monitor pH in the effluent stream.

As best seen in FIGS. 1 and 2 a turbidity meter 160 is provided in fluidcommunication with effluent outlet 50 for measuring the clarity oftreated wastewater effluent. Turbidity meter 160 comprises an output 162representative of turbidity as measured by any one of several standards,including Nephelopmetric Turbidity Units (NTU) or Jackson TurbidityUnits (JTU) operatively coupled to an input 110 of controller 100. Forpurposes of explication only the specification will refer to the measureof turbidity in NTU's. FIG. 2 depicts an alternative embodiment of thepresent invention wherein a second turbidity meter 160 is provided inthe wastewater stream 1 at a point downstream of floc tubes 60 butupstream of entry into tank 30 for monitoring the turbidity ofwastewater 1 that has been treated in floc tubes 60, as will bediscussed in greater detail herein below.

System 10 further comprises a plurality of additive pumps for supplyingmetered quantities of chemical additives to wastewater stream 1. FIG. 1depicts system 10 having three additive pumps: a coagulant pump 200, anda pair of polymer pumps 210. Each pump is in fluid communication withwastewater stream 1 proximate inlet 40 and floc tubes 60, upstream ofturbidity meter 160 whereby a metered flow of coagulant and polymers maybe supplied to wastewater stream 1. Pumps 200 and 210 are operativelycoupled to outputs 112 of controller 100, which provide an electricalsignal representative of a desired additive flow rate to pumps 200 and210, whereby controller 100 may meter chemical additives being suppliedto system 10 based upon desired effluent turbidity or other contaminantmeasures. In one embodiment of the present invention pumps 200 and 210may comprise positive displacement pumps or other commercially availablepumps capable of accurately metering fluid from a storage tank (notshown) to system 10. Pumps 200 and 210 may be operated by providing anoutput 112 to a variable frequency drive which in turn varies therotational speed of the shaft of an electric motor used to power pumps200, 210, as is known in the art. Alternatively, various metering pumpscapable of delivering measured fluid volumes may be employed withoutdeparting from the scope of the invention.

Typically, coagulant pump 200 may deliver a coagulant to system 10 floctubes 60 such as aluminum sulfate, aluminum chlorohydrate, ferricchloride, ferric sulfate, polyamine, poly-DADMAC, polyaluminumchlorohydrate, or any one of a wide variety of commercially availablecoagulants. Similarly, polymer pumps 210 may deliver cationic andanionic solutions at varying concentrations to floc tubes 60, therebypermitting mixing of wastewater stream 1 and chemical additives asstream 1 passes through floc tubes 60 into tank 30.

Additionally, a pH pump 220, or a plurality thereof, may be provided fordelivery of an alkaline or basic solution, or both, to balance the pH ofthe wastewater stream. As best seen in FIG. 2, a pair of pH pumps 220may be provided, one at a point in wastewater stream 1 prior to floctubes 60, and one at a point downstream of tank 30 whereby pH can beadjusted both prior to and subsequent to treatment of wastewater stream1.

It should be noted that while the description of the invention refersconsistently to both turbidity and pH as control variables forwastewater treatment, a wide variety of contaminant control variablesmay be used in place of turbidity or pH without departing from the scopeof the instant invention. For example, wastewater stream 1 may bemonitored for the presence of heavy metals or pH (alkilinity) andappropriate corrective additives may be metered to wastewater stream 1through additive pumps 200 in accordance with the system 10 and methodof the invention.

Referring now to FIG. 3, a plurality of system 10 parameters are shownthat may be input to controller 100 and stored in data memory 102 tocustomize system 10 operation for a wide variety of wastewater treatmentapplications. Parameters that my be set by and operator include aplurality of times at which jar test may be automatically, a maximumturbidity level (NTUmax) that, when detected by turbidity meter 160,will initiate a jar test, a time period (T1) for which NTUmax must bepresent prior to initiating a jar test, a minimum set point forcoagulant flow (COAGSP1), a maximum set point for coagulant flow(COAGSPMAX) and a flow increment rate for coagulant (COAGINC).Additionally, analogous parameters may be set for each additionaladditive used in system 10.

For purpose of example only, FIGS. 3 and 4 assume the use of a singlecoagulant additive and a pair of polymer additives. Accordingly, thefollowing parameters may be entered into controller 100 by an operatorfor each of polymer #1 and polymer #2 respectively: polymer minimum flowrate set points (POLY1SP1, POLY2SP1), polymer maximum flow rate setpoints (POLY1SPMAX, POLY2SPMAX) and a flow increment rate for eachpolymer (POLY1INC, POLY2INC). It should be noted that the flow rates setby an operator may be specified as, for example, a parts per million(ppm) flow rate. These flow rate settings may then be scaled bycontroller 100 to provide an output to pumps 200, 210, and 220 that isrepresentative of the number of parts per million selected based uponthe flow rate of the wastewater entering system 10, as read by flowtransmitter 140. By specifying these parameters and operator can achievea jar test utilizing the system and method of the invention that is farsuperior to conventional jar tests, as will be detailed herein below.

As one example or parameters that may be provided via operator interface120, 100 percent coagulant solution may be provided at a minimum flowrate set point (COAGSP1) of 50 parts per million (ppm), a maximum(COAGMAX) of 100 ppm, and an increment (COAGINC) of 10 ppm. Similarly,0.05% anionic polymer #1 solution may be provided at a minimum flow rateset point (POLY1SP1) of 8 ppm, a maximum (POLY1MAX) of 18 ppm, and anincrement (POLY1INC) of 2 ppm. Finally, a 0.05% cationic polymer #2solution may be provided at a minimum flow rate set point (POLY2SP1) of8 ppm, a maximum (POLY2MAX) of 26 ppm, and an increment (POLY1INC) of 2ppm. It will be understood that the above parameters are for purposes ofexplication and example only, and are in no way to be construed aslimiting of the invention.

Referring now to FIGS. 4A-4C, wastewater stream 1 may be efficaciouslytreated by system 10 by conducting the following system 10 operations.The initiation and conduct of a jar test for coagulant additive flowrates is depicted in FIGS. 4A-4C, shown as process 400. The steps in theprocesses described herein are conducted primarily through theapplication of programming instructions run in controller 100,responsive to measured process variables supplied to controller 100through its inputs 110 and operator interface 120.

Initially, at all times flow meter 140 provides flow signal 142 tocontroller 100 to enable controller 100 to continuously adjust theadditive supply rates of pumps 200, 210, and 200 to the current additiverates adjusted for the flow rate of wastewater stream 1. As one example,if wastewater stream flow rate 1 increases ten percent, the flow rateset points of pumps 200, 210 and 200 would likewise each increase tenpercent to accommodate the increased volume of wastewater. Thus eachpump 200, 210 and 220 supplies its respective additive to system 10 atpredetermined set point that is adjusted for wastewater flow rate bysupplying appropriate outputs 112 to the pumps. For purposes of example,the flow rate set point of coagulant pump 200 may be stored in a dataregister in controller 100 given the place name “COAGSP”. Similarly,polymer #1 and polymer #2 pumps 210 may have flow rate set pointregisters such as “POLY1SP” and “POLY2SP” respectively. While these flowrate set points will be referred to throughout the specification, theymay be replaced with any convenient terminology and are not limiting ofthe system and method of the invention described herein.

Turbidity is likewise continuously monitored, either by a singleturbidity meter 160 in the effluent stream 2 as shown in FIG. 1, oralternatively by a pair of turbidity meters 160, one in the effluentstream 2 and one disposed between floc tubes 60 and tank 30. Initially,controller 100 is supplied with a predetermined turbidity threshold, NTUmax, which is input through operator interface 120. When the turbidityas measured by turbidity meter 160 proximate effluent stream 2 exceedsNTU max for a predetermined time period T1, the jar testing process isinitiated, as shown in step 401. Both NTU max and T1 may be adjusted byan operator, by inputting appropriate values through use of operatorinterface 120. Additionally, the jar test can also be performed atpredetermined time intervals set by an operator through operatorinterface 120, or by a manual initiation through operator interface 120.

Once the jar test process is initiated, controller 100 provides aninitial coagulant pump flow rate set point (COAGSP1) as an output 110 tocoagulant pump 200 and also provides polymer #1 at an initial pump flowrate set point (POLY1SP1). Controller 100 also ceases providing otheradditives to system 10, thereby providing an initial baseline ofadditives from which to progress. Additionally, controller 100 storesthe flow rate settings for each additive in a storage register, shown inFIG. 4A as COAGFLOWRATE and POLY1FLOWRATE respectively. Additionally,the turbidity reading is stored in a separate register, NTUtest thatindicates a baseline turbidity level for the jar test. These storageregisters will only be written over when the jar test process encountersa better turbidity reading as the test progresses, which will bedetailed further below.

Controller 100 next increments the flow rate set point of polymer #1 bythe amount POLY1INC as set by an operator through interface 120, andstores it in polymer #1 pump flow rate register POLY1SP (Step 408).Controller 100 next tests the turbidity again to determine the result ofthe additional polymer #1 additive. If the turbidity reading NTU is lessthan the baseline turbidity reading NTUtest minus a threshold turbidityreduction NTUthreshold, then the new polymer #1 flow rate is stored inPOLY1FLOWRATE, the new turbidity reading is stored in NTUtest as abaseline, and the process continues. Note that in the embodiment of theinvention where two turbidity meters 160 are employed, during the jartest process the turbidity meter 160 proximate floc tubes 60 ismonitored, thereby providing a more immediate indication of the efficacyof the additives on wastewater stream 1, than would the turbidity meter160 at the exit of dissolved air filtration tank 30.

Next controller 100 checks to determine whether the maximum polymer #1flow rate has been reached by comparing POLY1SPMAX (the maximum polymer#1 flow rate) to POLY1SP (the current polymer #1 flow rate. If themaximum polymer #1 flow rate has not been reached, controller 100returns to step 408, again incrementing polymer #1 setpoint andre-checking turbidity. This process continues until polymer #1 reachesits maximum setpoint at step 414, whereupon the combination of polymer#1 and coagulant additives are checked together, as set forth in FIG.4B.

In step 416, polymer #1 is provided at its initial flow rate set pointPOLYSP1, and the coagulant flow rate set point (COAGSP) is incrementedthrough each successive iteration by COAGINC (step 418) and once againturbidity NTU is read to determine whether has improved greater than athreshold amount NTUthreshold. (Step 420). If turbidity has improvedsufficiently, the current coagulant set point COAGSP is store dinCOAGFLOWRATE, the current polymer #1 set point POLY1SP is stored inPOLY1FLOWRATE, and the reduced turbidity reading NTU is stored inNTUtest, as seen in step 422. If the turbidity has not improved,controller 100 returns to step 418, once again incrementing thecoagulant flow rate set point. As can be readily seen from this process,only the flow rate set points that produce the lowest (best) turbidityreadings are stored in the FLOWRATE registers, thus saving the additiveflow rate settings that produce the lowest turbidity.

As seen in step 424, if the coagulant flow rate has not reached itsmaximum set point COAGMAX, then the process returns to step 418,whereupon the coagulant flow rate set point is once again incremented byCOAGINC, and the turbidity is retested. If the coagulant flow rate setpoint COAGSP has reached it's maximum, then several conditions mustoccur, as shown in steps 426 and 428. Initially, the coagulant flow rateset point COAGSP is reset to its initial rate, COAGSP1. Next, thepolymer #1 flow rate set point (POLY1SP) is incremented by POLY1INC,and, as long as the polymer #1 flow rate set point (POLY1SP) has notexceed its maximum POLY1MAX, the process returns to step 418 such thateach coagulant flow rate set point is combined with each polymer #1 flowrate set point, and turbidity is checked in each case. As before, whereturbidity NTU has improved over a threshold amount NTUthreshold,coagulant flow rate set point (COAGSP) and polymer #1 set point(POLY1SP) are both stored in their respective flow rate registersCOAGFLOWRATE and POLY1FLOWRATE to indicate the best combination ofadditives. As seen in step 428, where the polymer #1 flow rate set pointreaches its maximum (POLY1MAX) the test proceeds to its final processsteps as detailed in FIG. 4C.

Finally, the polymer #2 additive is tested in conjunction with coagulantand polymer #1 to determine which additive combination produces thelowest turbidity system 10. As seen in step 430 coagulant and polymer #1are provided at their previously determined optimal flow rate setpoints, COAGFLOWRATE and POLY1FLOWRATE respectively. Next, in step 432polymer #2 is provided at its initial flow rate set point POLY2SP andturbidity is again retested (step 434). If the result of the test is abetter turbidity reading (minus the turbidity threshold NTUthreshold)then the polymer #2 flow rate set point is stored in POLY2FLOWRATE andthe turbidity reading NTU is stored in NTUtest as shown in step 436. Ifthe turbidity reading is not better than NTUtest, the polymer #2 flowrate set point POLY2SP is incremented by POLY2INC as shown in step 440,and the turbidity test is repeated. In this fashion, each flow rate setpoint of polymer #2 is tested with the best combination of coagulant andpolymer #1 to find the optimal combination of additives to produce thelowest turbidity levels.

As best seen in step 438, once the polymer #2 flow rate set pointreaches its maximum, POLY2SPMAX, each additive pump is set to the flowrate set point that produced the best turbidity readings throughout thetest. Accordingly, coagulant is set to COAGFLOWRATE, polymer #1 is setto POLY1FLOWRATE and polymer #2 is set to POLY2FLOWRATE. At this point,the jar test is complete, step 444. System 10 once again runs normally,awaiting the initiation of a new jar test under the conditions set forthin step 401. Once the jar test is complete, the turbidity meter at theexit of the DAF tank 30 is monitored for turbidity levels that wouldtrigger automatic initiation of a jar test.

The jar test process described above can be repeated for as manyadditives as necessary for a given wastewater treatment system 10application. In the system 10 depicted in FIG. 2, the jar test processmay also include first and second pH pumps 220 as desired. In thisembodiment of the invention, once optimal coagulant and polymer #1 andpolymer #2 flow rate set points are found, each pH pump is testedthrough an operator selectable number of increments to determine optimalpH flow rates. In this fashion, system 10 permits a series ofprogrammable and configurable jar tests to be conducted without the needfor actual withdrawal of fluid from the system or for the necessity ofhaving an operator perform multiple turbidity tests and flow ratecalculations. Alternatively, the operation of the pH pumps may becontrolled by operation of a controller 100 output 112 to provide aneffluent 2 pH within a predetermined range independently of theoperation of the coagulant 200 and polymer 210 pumps. It should be notedthat in some applications it may be necessary to determine proper pHadjustment during the jar test procedure 400. In these applications pHmay be tested in conjunction with the optimal additives as determined byjar test 400. Furthermore, in an analogous fashion to the coagulant andpolymer additives, a user may specify maximum and minimum pH additiveflow rates, as well as flow rate increments at which to test pH.

In an alternative embodiment of the present invention where a first andsecond turbidity meter 162 are used as shown in FIG. 2, controller 100utilizes the turbidity reading from the turbidity meter 160 disposedproximate effluent 2 to initiate jar tests but utilizes the turbidityreading from the turbidity meter 160 disposed between floc tubes 60 andtank 30 to conduct jar test. This embodiment of the invention provides amuch quicker turbidity feedback than utilizing a single turbidity meter160.

While the present invention has been shown and described herein in whatare considered to be the preferred embodiments thereof, illustrating theresults and advantages over the prior art obtained through the presentinvention, the invention is not limited to those specific embodiments.Thus, the forms of the invention shown and described herein are to betaken as illustrative only and other embodiments may be selected withoutdeparting from the scope of the present invention, as set forth in theclaims appended hereto.

1. A method of treating a wastewater stream to produce an effluentstream having a turbidity within a predetermined acceptable rangeutilizing a controller having an operator interface, a turbidity meterhaving an output operatively coupled to an input of the controller, anda plurality of additive pumps controlled by said controller forsupplying a plurality of chemical treatment additives to said wastewaterstream responsive to a periodic jar test comprising the steps of: a.)monitoring the turbidity of said effluent stream; b.) initiating saidjar test when the turbidity of said effluent stream is greater than apredetermined threshold, said jar test comprising the steps of; i.)supplying a first additive to said wastewater stream at an initial flowrate set point; ii.) supplying a second additive to said wastewaterstream at an initial flow rate set point; iii.) stopping the supply ofall other additives to said wastewater stream; iv.) storing the currentturbidity measurement in a turbidity data storage register and storingthe first and second additive flow rates in respective flow rateregisters; v.) incrementing the flow rate of said first additive by apredetermined amount; vi.) monitoring the current turbidity of saideffluent stream; vii.) when said current turbidity is less than theturbidity saved in said turbidity data storage register, saving thecurrent turbidity reading in said turbidity data storage register,saving the first additive flow rate in said first additive data storageregister and returning to step b.) v.); viii.) when said currentturbidity is greater than the turbidity saved in said turbidity datastorage register, returning to step b.) v.) unless said first additiveflow rate is greater than or equal to a predetermined maximum flow ratefor said first additive; ix.) when said first additive flow rate isgreater than or equal to a predetermined maximum flow rate for saidfirst additive, supplying said first additive at its initial flow rateand repeating steps v.) through ix.) for each of said plurality ofchemical treatment additives; and c.) supplying each of said pluralityof additives at the flow rates stored in their respective flow rateregisters.
 2. A method of treating a wastewater stream to produce aneffluent stream as claimed in claim 1 wherein step b.) ii.) comprises:specifying an initial flow rate set point, a flow rate increment amountand a maximum flow rate set point for each additive.
 3. A method oftreating a wastewater stream to produce an effluent stream as claimed inclaim 2 comprising the step of: supplying said plurality of additives tosaid wastewater stream at their respective initial flow rate set pointsexcept for said additive whose flow rate set point is being incremented.4. A method of treating a wastewater stream as claimed in claim 2wherein step b) comprises: initiating a jar test upon receiving anoperator request through said operator interface.
 5. A method oftreating a wastewater stream as claimed in claim 2 wherein step b)comprises: initiating a jar test at predetermined intervals provided tosaid controller through said operator interface.
 6. A method of treatinga wastewater stream as claimed in claim 2 wherein step b) comprises:initiating a jar test upon receiving an operator request through saidoperator interface.
 7. A method of treating a wastewater stream asclaimed in claim 2 wherein step b.) vii.) comprises: when said currentturbidity is less than the turbidity saved in said turbidity datastorage register minus a predetermined turbidity improvement threshold,saving the current turbidity reading in said turbidity data storageregister, saving the first additive flow rate in said first additivedata storage register and returning to step b.) v.).